The Story of Cap and Trade

Task: “In your opinion, how should the industrial design community react to the climate change solution discussed in this movie?”

The Story of Cap and Trade depicts a fundamental flaw in society – the pursuit of wealth over the environment. Abusing the environment to gain wealth seems to be a common trend today in a society where we are governed by how much we’re worth. The emissions trading scheme or the carbon stock market occurring in the U.S. is predicted to burst like the subprime mortgages market, yet no one has stepped in to stop this. There needs to be a governing body willing to stand up and address this issue and utilise the nation’s resources to develop a better system.

“The future of our planet is at stake.” It’s something that we’ve all heard of, even in the movies, and I feel that I was uninterested and unmotivated by this movie in particular. However, my view of the industrial design community and its role with climate change is that there should be a greater focus on addressing this issue, especially with stronger government support. There is a clear lack of government intervention and it’s a fundamental reason as to why nothing is being done to avert the damage to the environment. Design is leading us to a new era where there is hope of recovering from the damage done by polluting corporations. More efficient and innovative ways of manufacturing products are emerging and should continue until further changes are met.

As I felt that there wasn’t a clear motive for the film, there isn’t exactly a solution that the industrial design community have to work towards. The message I received after watching The Story of Cap and Trade was that society should work together to find a better solution to solving the climate change problem and that no one had done that yet. Perhaps, the responsibility of the design community is to concentrate on developing a system that envelopes society as a whole in order to create awareness, understanding and force change upon them to stop climate change. Therefore, the industrial design community should react with careful hostility towards climate change and have a prudent outlook on possible solutions at hand to tackle the issue.

There really weren’t any quotes I found worth discussing or enlightening. After viewing The 11th Hour and Waste = Food, nothing surprises me with society and its lack of respect towards the environment. Although, the blatant cheating by large corporations to gain offset permits should be stopped and further cheating should be monitored by changing the lax restrictions currently in place.

As for the film itself, I honestly found it to be a cheap attempt at making a relatively boring social issue into something fun and educational. But it fails to achieve what it sets out to do. It is basically a classroom lesson with facts and figures accompanied by poorly drawn animations that I suppose attempt to look cute and hold the viewer’s attention for the duration of those dismal 9 minutes.

Designing for Disasters Presentation

INTRODUCTION

The effects of natural disasters can be devastating to any nation, but none more so than third world countries that do not possess the necessary strategies and resources to assist in the four phases of emergency management. The prevention, preparedness, response and reconstruction phases involve a great deal of thought as well as insight into the trauma of people who experience the effects of disasters. Generally, after an emergency situation, basic assumptions about life, including safety and fundamental necessities, can be shattered.

DESIGN RATIONALE

In Bangladesh, natural disasters such as cyclones occur relatively often, with an average of 16 times a decade[1]. Cyclones result in widespread damage, particularly in the urban slum areas of Dhaka, Narangayanj and Chittagong. These areas are also generally surrounded by a contaminated water source which often leads to flooding during the aftermath of a cyclone. Some urban slum houses are also prone to waterlogging[2], resulting in residents to place their possessions onto elevated surfaces.

Most urban slum houses have the bare minimum in furniture and supplies and those that live inside sleep on blankets or fabrics panned out on the ground[3]. As a result of their lack of resources, the effects of a cyclone can be severely destructive to their homes. Immediate aid including medical services, food, drinking water, clothing and hygiene items are generally distributed to those most affected[4]. However, eventually the Bangladeshi people must find ways to return to their daily duties in the slum areas and often it involves collecting water, firewood or finding and sorting material for sale[5].

For the purpose of this project, I chose to focus on the reconstruction efforts within the urban slum areas to help restore the lives of those that have lost almost everything. When a cyclone hits, the resulting destruction often includes loss of basic shelter, food, water and morale. To deal with this sudden impact of bereavement and to somehow improve the living situation, I have proposed a bag designed to carry supplies, including firewood, recycled fabrics from landfill or water jugs. When the bag is not being used, it is unfolded and used indoors as a bed by attaching the existing flaps to a bed frame that interlocks with two quick release latches. Currently, the Bangladeshi people tend to carry supplies upon their heads or holding them in their arms[6] which leaves little mobility in their hands and arms.

The materials used for the bag/bed cover is hessian, which can be readily found in Bangladesh either from purchasing gunny sacks or from landfill. The fabric is then sewn together from the recycled material and shaped to the bag template. The framing for the bed comes in two parts constructed from aluminium tubing that is bent and welded to form the curvature of the corners and legs. When the frame is not in use, it can be placed aside to a wall within the home, while the bag is used outdoors. The lightweight fabric is also very strong and is ideal in carrying stacked firewood or supplies by folding the bag in half and tying the straps together. The side flaps where the tubing is inserted can also be folded into the bag to form a stronger edging.

To receive the bag, they must exchange taka (Bangladeshi currency) for it, though as an incentive, the frame and fabric can be purchased at a discounted rate by providing recycled hessian material in the production of the design. Also, by paying for the product, they are more likely to use it, rather than sell it to make money.

This design is a possible solution that can assist in their long term reconstruction of their lives by providing a slightly eased way of conducting activities which would generally be done by other means. It is not intended to force upon a change to their traditional ways of carrying out their daily duties but to give them an alternative method while also offering an added function when being used in the home.

---

[1]“Background Note: Bangladesh”, 2009, <http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/3452.htm> (accessed April 30, 2010)

[2] “Environment/Pollution”, 2009, <http://www.sos-arsenic.net/english/environment/> (accessed April 30, 2010)

[3] Huzue, I. “Urban Slum Mapping in Bangladesh”, 2006, CEGIS, pg.21-36

[4] “Final report – Bangladesh: Cyclone Sidr”, 2010, International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, pg.6

[5] “Recycling”, 2009, <http://urbanpovertyinbangladesh.blogspot.com/2009/05/recycling.html> (accessed April 30, 2010)

[6] “’Ei Je’ (“Hello”) From Bangladesh”, 2008, <http://www.msf.org.au/from-the-field/field-blogs/ei-je-hello-from-bangladesh.html> (accessed April 30, 2010)

Design For Life

Task: “Reflect on the design ethics that Starck wanted the young product designers to demonstrate.”

In the beginning of the series, Philippe Starck was introduced as an innovative designer that produced eye-catching and at times controversial products that gained mixed reviews. Despite his way of thinking and his often outlandish personality, he has developed his own system of design ethics which he expects his student designers to respect and assume within their time as contestants. Starck believes in sustainable design and that it’s a force which has the power to change society. There is a movement towards sustainable design today and the future will undoubtedly see a progression towards green living, which is why the designers of today should be working towards building a greener tomorrow.

Initially, the contestants showed much enthusiasm to be working with Starck, but their flaws began to show after the first challenge. Their way of thinking was still very limited and Starck acknowledged this with disappointment, as did I because I really enjoyed this series and expected more talent from these individuals. However, Starck attempted to bestow some of his unique wisdom (though very unhelpful to them) through his criticism of their design decisions. Starck believes design is, “...to help your tribe, society to have a better life,” and is true since the beginning of design.

Starck has an interesting demeanour and is very particular with what he wants, yet he doesn’t give constructive criticism. What he expected from his contestants constantly changed and differed with each designer. Though, what he strongly believed was that there are, “...too many products that don’t deserve to be produced...” in the market today. The challenges developed and revealed more of Starck’s fundamental ideologies of finding ways of creating environmentally sustainable methods of production as well as using ecologically friendly materials. This focus on sustainability proved difficult for the designers as they attempted to understand the significance of designing with the environment in mind.

Furthermore, Starck wanted the designers to, “...find the story behind the product. Why is it sustainable?” By addressing this question, the designers are confronted with the challenge that the earth is currently experiencing – how to offset the degradation of the earth due to unsustainable design. As well as facing global environmental issues, Starck expected not only design, but creativity and ambition, which he regards highly in a designers arsenal. With that said, the products he sees now are becoming smaller and, “Tomorrow will be more and more minimalistic,” which depicts his view that most products are heading towards the pocket sized, hand held kind. It’s not clear whether he approves of this or not, but he acknowledges this event and suggests it may be a direction the designers can take in their challenges.

Throughout the episodes, we unravel Starck’s underlying annoyances with society and what should be done to change the way people think about their products. An understanding that, “Designers need to embrace the future by putting sustainability into the heart of their work.” There are so many products in the market today that shouldn’t be there because of the waste they produce in their disposal and manufacturing. Modern product designers should develop their own design ethics that encompass the ideals of sustainable design and environmental awareness.

Charette 2

For our charette no.2 we were asked to disassemble an everyday product and identify all of the materials used to produce it in order to gain insight into environmental and manufacturing costs. We used Greenfly resources for this task

We began by disassembling the kettle down to every single screw and weighed and identified the materials used to produce the parts. These descriptions were then put into the Greenfly site to produce figures that relate to the environmental impact and manufacturing costs involved in producing this product.

Our new design took away the boil button and removed unnecessary materials around the handle and base. The overall form was shorter and wider so as to allow the same capacity it could contain before. We also gave the kettle an added function of being able to be placed onto the stove. The added function allows the kettle to boil water from use of the base as well as a stove. So it would be possible to boil eggs and things in it too.

The new design produced a better outcome in terms of material usage and wastage.

Waste=Food

Task: “Reflect on the cradle-to-cradle protocol discussed in the video. How should industrial designers react to this principle?

The cradle-to-cradle protocol is essentially a closed loop cycle powered by renewable energy throughout each element of the manufacturing process. This protocol is a response to the changing efforts to increasing environmental issues seen from large organisations in society. The original cradle-to-grave system was a linear practice that did not take into account the energy and natural resources that is used to produce, distribute and dispose of a product.

This circular economy adopted by China in recent years sees materials and energy in closed cycles to build a better and healthier nation. As industrial designers, a similar approach should be taken towards each endeavour as a way to limit the increasing amount of waste during the manufacturing process. Before beginning any design, thought should be taken into each stage of development and a focus on sustainability is needed to address the issue of waste. Every part of the design process from conceptualisation to the product’s end of life involves some type of waste. The role of the industrial designer is to identify ways optimise every stage to extend the life of a product and improve the end of life system of these products.

“...everything in biology should go back to soil safely... so the waste of a system would go back to soil...so waste equals food.” – William McDonough

The thought of everything natural and manmade in the world having a cycle is evident with all that we see around us. The same could be said with what we consume for sustenance and nourishment. In a way, designers should be designing so that the end product will eventually find a sustainable way back into the natural environment.

“Everything is a nutrient...when you throw it away, it regenerates life. Only we take things and don’t give anything back” – Michael Braungart

Humans are lazy and tend not to care what they throw away into the environment or what they take from it. So it’s up to the designers to improve the way they produce goods in order to educate people in the effects of a product when it’s time to dispose of it.

“To try to minismise being bad is not enough. Less bad is no good. So try to be good instead of less bad because for less bad, we have too many people on this planet.” – Michael Braungart

This quote by the German toxicologist is a confusing and strange account of what humanity has become. Society is evil towards the environment. Taking everything that it’s produced and barely returning anything back to replenish what was taken. Ideally, everything that has been used would be replaced by something planted back into the earth, however, we take at such an astounding rate that with what we put back, it has no real effect to the positive goodness of the earth.

where LG got its logo from

essential products that we need

If i can design a product that will end up on late night shopping tv, i know i've made it as a designer!